HUMANITY VS. AI: Two legal titans present their arguments in the trial of the century.

The first attorney represents humanity. His job is to stop AI dead in its tracks and save the world. The second attorney represents artificial intelligence. Her goal is to protect AI and allow it to develop and improve. She believes AI will save the human race.

Who makes the better argument?

Who wins?

Author: Mitch Jackson

I'm a California trial lawyer trying to fix the world one client, cause, and digital interaction at a time.

Please share your thoughts!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: